Cursarium logoCursarium
intermediateFree

Quality and Safety for LLM Applications

by Bernease Herman · DeepLearning.AI

4.5
(3,800 reviews)
60K+ enrolled1 hourUpdated 2024-07

Our Verdict

Worth it — with caveats

Quality and Safety for LLM Applications is a free ~1-hour DeepLearning.AI short course, built with WhyLabs and taught by Bernease Herman (Senior Data Scientist at WhyLabs), that teaches hands-on techniques to evaluate and monitor LLM outputs for hallucinations, jailbreaks/prompt injections, toxicity, and data leakage. It is a practical, code-first primer (7 lessons, 5 code examples) that leans on WhyLabs' open-source LangKit and whylogs libraries to compute safety and quality metrics. Worth flagging up front: DeepLearning.AI announced on March 18, 2026 that this course is being deprecated/retired, so its availability and tooling are no longer guaranteed to be current. As an independent editorial assessment based on the official syllabus, the partner announcement, and public learner write-ups, it remains a solid free introduction to the *concepts* of LLM evaluation, but it is dated and tightly coupled to one vendor's stack. We did not personally complete the course; this is analysis of the published curriculum plus aggregated public feedback.

Genuinely useful free, fast, hands-on intro to concrete LLM-safety metrics (SelfCheckGPT, toxicity/sentiment, entity recognition, vector similarity) — but it is short, vendor-specific (WhyLabs LangKit/whylogs), and officially deprecated as of March 2026, so take it only if you want a quick concept overview and not a current, comprehensive evaluation curriculum.

Best for: Developers and ML/AI engineers with basic Python who are starting to put LLM apps into production and want a fast, practical introduction to detecting hallucinations, prompt injections/jailbreaks, toxic output, and PII/data leakage, and to the idea of continuous safety monitoring.

Skip if: Complete beginners without Python; people who want a deep, rigorous, or up-to-date treatment of LLM evaluation (RAGAS, LLM-as-judge, benchmark design, red-teaming at depth); and anyone who wants vendor-neutral tooling — the course is built around WhyLabs LangKit/whylogs and has been officially deprecated, so newer alternatives are a better long-term investment.

About This Course

Learn to evaluate LLM outputs for hallucinations, toxicity, and bias, and build guardrails for production LLM apps.

What You'll Learn

Detect hallucinations using methods such as SelfCheckGPT, response self-similarity, and prompt-response relevance
Identify jailbreaks and prompt injections using sentiment analysis and implicit toxicity detection models
Detect data leakage and PII exposure using named-entity recognition and vector (embedding) similarity
Measure toxicity and other quality/safety signals on LLM inputs and outputs
Use WhyLabs LangKit and whylogs to compute and log text metrics for LLM monitoring
Build a custom passive and active monitoring system to evaluate an LLM application's safety and quality over time

Curriculum

Introduction

Course framing by Andrew Ng / DeepLearning.AI on why quality and safety are a barrier to deploying LLM apps.

Overview

Survey of the safety/quality risks (hallucinations, jailbreaks, data leakage, toxicity) and the metric-based monitoring approach using WhyLabs LangKit/whylogs.

Hallucinations

Detecting ungrounded/false output via methods like SelfCheckGPT, response self-similarity, and prompt-to-response relevance.

Data Leakage

Finding PII and confidential-data exposure using named-entity recognition and vector/embedding similarity analysis.

Refusals and prompt injections

Identifying jailbreaks and prompt-injection attempts using sentiment analysis and implicit toxicity detection models.

Passive and active monitoring

Combining offline (passive) evaluation with real-time (active) checks to build an ongoing monitoring system for an LLM app.

Conclusion

Wrap-up and guidance on extending the metrics to your own LLM, followed by a short quiz.

Prerequisites

  • Basic Python proficiency
  • Familiarity with calling/using LLMs (prompting and reading model output)
  • Helpful but not required: basic understanding of NLP concepts like embeddings/sentiment

Instructor

Bernease Herman

Instructor · DeepLearning.AI

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Free and very fast (~1 hour, 7 lessons, 5 runnable code examples) — low-commitment way to get hands-on with LLM-safety metrics
  • Concrete, code-first techniques (SelfCheckGPT, sentiment/toxicity, NER, vector similarity) rather than abstract theory
  • Covers the four production pain points that matter most: hallucinations, prompt injection/jailbreaks, toxicity, and PII/data leakage
  • Taught by a practitioner from WhyLabs and produced under the trusted DeepLearning.AI brand, with a working Jupyter environment in the platform

Cons

  • Officially deprecated by DeepLearning.AI (announced March 18, 2026), so content is dated and long-term availability is not guaranteed
  • Tightly coupled to one vendor's stack (WhyLabs LangKit + whylogs), which limits transferability versus more neutral evaluation frameworks
  • Very shallow by design — ~1 hour cannot cover modern evaluation depth (LLM-as-judge, RAGAS, benchmark/eval-set design, systematic red-teaming)
  • No certificate; rating breadth is hard to verify independently (no Class Central listing and no visible rating count on the Coursera mirror)

Alternatives To Consider

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Quality and Safety for LLM Applications free?

Yes — Quality and Safety for LLM Applications is free to access. Free to take on the DeepLearning.AI learning platform (no certificate). A near-identical version is also listed as a free guided project on Coursera. Note: the course was announced as deprecated/retired on March 18, 2026, so access may be removed.

Who is Quality and Safety for LLM Applications for?

Developers and ML/AI engineers with basic Python who are starting to put LLM apps into production and want a fast, practical introduction to detecting hallucinations, prompt injections/jailbreaks, toxic output, and PII/data leakage, and to the idea of continuous safety monitoring.

What will you learn in Quality and Safety for LLM Applications?

Detect hallucinations using methods such as SelfCheckGPT, response self-similarity, and prompt-response relevance; Identify jailbreaks and prompt injections using sentiment analysis and implicit toxicity detection models; Detect data leakage and PII exposure using named-entity recognition and vector (embedding) similarity; Measure toxicity and other quality/safety signals on LLM inputs and outputs.

What are the prerequisites for Quality and Safety for LLM Applications?

Basic Python proficiency; Familiarity with calling/using LLMs (prompting and reading model output); Helpful but not required: basic understanding of NLP concepts like embeddings/sentiment.

Is Quality and Safety for LLM Applications worth it?

Genuinely useful free, fast, hands-on intro to concrete LLM-safety metrics (SelfCheckGPT, toxicity/sentiment, entity recognition, vector similarity) — but it is short, vendor-specific (WhyLabs LangKit/whylogs), and officially deprecated as of March 2026, so take it only if you want a quick concept overview and not a current, comprehensive evaluation curriculum.